Coral Reefs: A Reef Resilience Toolkit Module

Replication

Why Include Replicate Habitat Types within MPAs?

Replication of habitat types within MPAs within a network is important for several reasons:

  • To provide a stepping-stone for the dispersal of marine species
  • To insure against catastrophic local disasters that can significantly impact an individual, small MPA
  • For use as reference sites during monitoring and to evaluate the effects of human influences on communities

Replication is the inclusion of multiple samples of habitat types in MPAs and networks to spread the risk of large-scale events, such as bleaching. Replication of protected resistant and resilient coral communities at multiple sites increases the probability that some reefs will survive bleaching, and helps the recovery of affected areas.

MPA networks are most effective when each habitat type is represented in more than one MPA. The goal of representation could be met by having only one MPA for each biodiversity element; however, if the habitat is destroyed in the one MPA, representation of that diversity would be compromised, as there would be nothing under protection. Replication provides a buffer against catastrophic loss of an MPA.

To spread the risk of damage or extinction by ensuring that habitat types are replicated in the network, the following guidelines are recommended:

California Central Coast MPA design includes several replicate habitats. Click image for larger version. Taken from Guide to the Central California Marine Protected Areas

Replicate MPA sites enable the dispersal of marine species between areas. Many marine species follow a stepping stone model1, in which populations exchange larvae with adjacent populations. Replicate MPAs can be designed to accommodate dispersal patterns of species, and facilitate connectivity between the sites. Spacing considerations will also influence fulfilling the stepping stone role of MPAs.

Replication of MPAs also provides analytical power for management comparisons. With more than one MPA, reference, or control sites, can be incorporated into the monitoring program to evaluate the biological changes in and between each of the MPAs. This type of comparison facilitates adaptive management.

 

See Full Citations

1 Palumbi 2003a

 

Bleaching Basics
Bleaching Biology
Mass Bleaching
Bleaching Impacts
Recovery from Bleaching
Ocean Acidification
Ocean Chemistry Essentials
Acidification Impacts
Management Strategies
Coral Disease
Causes
Impacts
Management
Identifying Resilience
Ecological Factors
Biological Factors
Physical Factors
Social Resilience
Principles
Strategies
Data Gathering
Data Collection
Data Analysis
Data Synthesis
GIS Example
Resilient MPA Design
Representation
Inclusion of Critical Areas
Incorporating Connectivity
Size and Spacing
Socioeconomic Criteria
Managing for Resilience
Implementing Resilience
Management Essentials
Bleaching Monitoring
Resilience Monitoring
Measuring Effectiveness
Broad-Scale Management
Communicating Resilience
Importance of Coral Reefs
Threats to Coral Reefs
Communication Tools
Communication Examples
Coral Restoration
Background
Physical Restoration
Biological Restoration
Coral Nurseries
Coral Transplantation
Monitoring and Maintenance
Restoration Case Studies
Case Studies
Agatti, India
Aldabra, Seychelles
Bonaire
British Virgin Islands
Florida Keys
Great Barrier Reef
Kimbe Bay, PNG
Kiunga, Kenya
Lesser Sunda Ecoregion
Maui, Hawai‘i
MesoAmerican Reef
Micronesia
Mozambique
Palau
Raja Ampat, Indonesia
U.S. Virgin Islands
Wakatobi, Indonesia
Resources
Glossary
References
Related Tools
www.reefresilience.org     Copyright © 2007-2012 The Nature Conservancy