Coral Reefs: A Reef Resilience Toolkit Module

Size and Spacing

Reserve placement based on optimization analysis, Kimbe Bay, showing Areas of Interest (boxed) for biodiversity conservation. Click image for larger version. Image courtesy The Nature Conservancy

The size, shape and spacing of individual MPAs in an MPA network greatly influence the degree to which conditions in the wider environment affect the features of the MPA, and exchange of individuals between the MPA and adjacent environment. The three components of size, spacing, and shape should be considered in design of the MPA network to facilitate and promote connectivity between and within the MPA network.

Models of the impacts of MPAs on population dynamics suggest that multiple MPAs can have three kinds of effects on ecosystems:1

  1. Additive effects — for example, the increase in population size from the entire network is simply the sum of the increases that would be observed from each reserve in isolation.
  2. Declining effects if the marginal value of extra protection declines as more areas are protected. For example, the number of species protected within a reserve is a function of its placement, habitat heterogeneity and the area. Doubling the area in reserves will not necessarily double the number of species protected.
  3. Multiplicative effect on ecosystems if the reserve system, as a whole, has greater benefits than the additive sum of the benefits of individual reserves.

Achieving these multiplicative effects should be the goal when designing reserve networks.

Deciding how many, how large, and how far apart MPAs should be is a challenge. Ultimately, size, shape and spacing design of an MPA network will vary with the goals and objectives of the MPA, as well as the social and economic environment in which it is located. However, there are some general design guidelines on size, shape and spacing of each MPA that will help to ensure maximum benefits to individual MPAs within a larger MPA network.2

Size Matters, Optimal Spacing, and Shape Matters provide detail on the size, shape, and spacing consideration for MPA design.

 

See Full Citations

1 Gaines et al. 2010

2 PISCO 2007

 

Bleaching Basics
Bleaching Biology
Mass Bleaching
Bleaching Impacts
Recovery from Bleaching
Ocean Acidification
Ocean Chemistry Essentials
Acidification Impacts
Management Strategies
Coral Disease
Causes
Impacts
Management
Identifying Resilience
Ecological Factors
Biological Factors
Physical Factors
Social Resilience
Principles
Strategies
Data Gathering
Data Collection
Data Analysis
Data Synthesis
GIS Example
Resilient MPA Design
Representation
Inclusion of Critical Areas
Incorporating Connectivity
Size and Spacing
Socioeconomic Criteria
Managing for Resilience
Implementing Resilience
Management Essentials
Bleaching Monitoring
Resilience Monitoring
Measuring Effectiveness
Broad-Scale Management
Communicating Resilience
Importance of Coral Reefs
Threats to Coral Reefs
Communication Tools
Communication Examples
Coral Restoration
Background
Physical Restoration
Biological Restoration
Coral Nurseries
Coral Transplantation
Monitoring and Maintenance
Restoration Case Studies
Case Studies
Agatti, India
Aldabra, Seychelles
Bonaire
British Virgin Islands
Florida Keys
Great Barrier Reef
Kimbe Bay, PNG
Kiunga, Kenya
Lesser Sunda Ecoregion
Maui, Hawai‘i
MesoAmerican Reef
Micronesia
Mozambique
Palau
Raja Ampat, Indonesia
U.S. Virgin Islands
Wakatobi, Indonesia
Resources
Glossary
References
Related Tools
www.reefresilience.org     Copyright © 2007-2012 The Nature Conservancy