Coral Reefs: A Reef Resilience Toolkit Module

Measuring Management Effectiveness

The Need for Evaluating Management Effectiveness

Management effectiveness is the degree to which management actions are achieving the intended goals and objectives of an MPA. Effective management requires continuous feedback of information to achieve the stated objectives through evaluation, which consists of reviewing the results of actions taken, and assessing whether the actions are producing the desired outcomes. In order to complete successful evaluations, management teams should develop consistent records of management actions and data. Evaluating management effectiveness can, and should, lead to improved management planning, implementation, and accountability; it can provide the MPA with information with which to implement adaptive management strategies. For example, evaluation results may help to:

Effective management depends on measurement and evaluation. Photo © David Obura

Indicators for Evaluating Management Effectiveness

Periodic and comprehensive assessments of the social and natural processes occurring within and outside the boundaries of the MPA are required to adequately and adaptively manage MPAs. The many different biophysical, socioeconomic, and governance aspects associated with MPAs are organized into indicators (or parameters) that should be considered in the evaluation of the management effectiveness of the MPA. An indicator is a unit of information, measured over time, that enables managers to gauge changes in specific characteristics of the MPA. Identifying and developing indictors to continually assess the performance of MPAs is fundamental to evaluating whether the goals and objectives are achieved. Indicators for evaluating management effectiveness include:

Biophysical indicators: Focal species abundance and population structure, habitat complexity, type and return on fishing effort, and water quality.

Socioeconomic indicators: For example, perception of seafood availability, community infrastructure, resource use patterns, local values and beliefs about marine resources.

Governance (or institutional) indicators: For example, level of resource conflict, local understanding of MPA rules and regulations, existence and adequacy of formal legislation, existence and activity level of community organization and engagement with MPA management.

The Basic Steps for Evaluating Management Effectiveness

The basic steps below help identify how to evaluate MPA management success. The table illustrates the steps with examples for each of the three indicator types.

  1. Clearly identify desired conservation outcome(s) and related management objective(s) for the MPA.
  2. Identify and develop indicators (social, biophysical, and governance) for evaluating MPA management effectiveness to determine if the management actions have achieved their objective.
  3. Design and implement a monitoring program aimed at measuring change in indicators as a result of the management action. This requires monitoring replicate sites both inside and outside the MPA, both prior to and after the management action.
  4. Analyze the data collected during monitoring efforts, and develop a communication plan to share the information to the appropriate audiences.
  5. Disseminate results and share with stakeholders. Based on feedback, modify management strategies and monitoring efforts accordingly.
  Sample Indicators
Steps Biophysical Socioeconomic Governance
Step 1: Identify conservation outcomes and related management objectives

To protect and maintain the biodiversity of the area

To protect sustainable livelihoods

To ensure the MPA is managed

Step 2: Identify and develop indicators

Focal species abundance

Composition and structure of the community

Local values and beliefs about marine resources

Material style of life, household income distribution by source

Level of understanding of human impacts on resources

Existence of decision-making and management body and management plan

Availability of MPA administrative resources

Degree of interaction between managers and stakeholders

Clearly defined enforcement procedures

Step 3: Monitor management actions

Reef Check methodology for evaluating focal species abundance

Benthic coral reef survey for composition and structure of community

Survey questionnaire applied through one-on-one interviews with heads of households (both in communities within an MPA area and outside).

Analysis of official enforcement reports and semi-structured interviews with enforcement agencies and officials

Step 4: Analyze data and develop communication plan

Summarize individual reports for the survey activities

Summarize individual reports for the survey activities

Summarize individual reports for the survey activities

Step 5: Disseminate results and share with stakeholders

Presentations and public meetings to share reports

Presentations and public meetings to share reports. Work with management agencies and stakeholders to develop appropriate management strategies.

Host workshops and small meetings with management practitioners to share reports, and develop strategies.

Detailed examples of these Five Steps are also included in Monitoring Effectiveness, Monitoring Protocols, and Adaptive Management.

Resources

The Protected Areas Management Effectiveness Information Module

 

Return to Top

 

Bleaching Basics
Bleaching Biology
Mass Bleaching
Bleaching Impacts
Recovery from Bleaching
Ocean Acidification
Ocean Chemistry Essentials
Acidification Impacts
Management Strategies
Coral Disease
Causes
Impacts
Management
Identifying Resilience
Ecological Factors
Biological Factors
Physical Factors
Social Resilience
Principles
Strategies
Data Gathering
Data Collection
Data Analysis
Data Synthesis
GIS Example
Resilient MPA Design
Representation
Inclusion of Critical Areas
Incorporating Connectivity
Size and Spacing
Socioeconomic Criteria
Managing for Resilience
Implementing Resilience
Management Essentials
Bleaching Monitoring
Resilience Monitoring
Measuring Effectiveness
Broad-Scale Management
Communicating Resilience
Importance of Coral Reefs
Threats to Coral Reefs
Communication Tools
Communication Examples
Coral Restoration
Background
Physical Restoration
Biological Restoration
Coral Nurseries
Coral Transplantation
Monitoring and Maintenance
Restoration Case Studies
Case Studies
Agatti, India
Aldabra, Seychelles
Bonaire
British Virgin Islands
Florida Keys
Great Barrier Reef
Kimbe Bay, PNG
Kiunga, Kenya
Lesser Sunda Ecoregion
Maui, Hawai‘i
MesoAmerican Reef
Micronesia
Mozambique
Palau
Raja Ampat, Indonesia
U.S. Virgin Islands
Wakatobi, Indonesia
Resources
Glossary
References
Related Tools
www.reefresilience.org     Copyright © 2007-2011 The Nature Conservancy