Measuring Management Effectiveness
The Need for Evaluating Management Effectiveness
Management effectiveness is the degree to which management actions are achieving the intended goals and objectives of an MPA. Effective management requires continuous feedback of information to achieve the stated objectives through evaluation, which consists of reviewing the results of actions taken, and assessing whether the actions are producing the desired outcomes. In order to complete successful evaluations, management teams should develop consistent records of management actions and data. Evaluating management effectiveness can, and should, lead to improved management planning, implementation, and accountability; it can provide the MPA with information with which to implement adaptive management strategies. For example, evaluation results may help to:
- Change zoning plans to enable full protection of bleaching resistant sites
- Increase surveillance, enforcement, and management interventions at resistant or resilient sites
- Identify areas of strong recruitment
- Modify education programs and outreach about coral reef and fishery resources
- Enhance public participation in management activities
Effective management depends on measurement and evaluation. Photo © David Obura
Indicators for Evaluating Management Effectiveness
Periodic and comprehensive assessments of the social and natural processes occurring within and outside the boundaries of the MPA are required to adequately and adaptively manage MPAs. The many different biophysical, socioeconomic, and governance aspects associated with MPAs are organized into indicators (or parameters) that should be considered in the evaluation of the management effectiveness of the MPA. An indicator is a unit of information, measured over time, that enables managers to gauge changes in specific characteristics of the MPA. Identifying and developing indictors to continually assess the performance of MPAs is fundamental to evaluating whether the goals and objectives are achieved. Indicators for evaluating management effectiveness include:
Biophysical indicators: Focal species abundance and population structure, habitat complexity, type and return on fishing effort, and water quality.
Socioeconomic indicators: For example, perception of seafood availability, community infrastructure, resource use patterns, local values and beliefs about marine resources.
Governance (or institutional) indicators: For example, level of resource conflict, local understanding of MPA rules and regulations, existence and adequacy of formal legislation, existence and activity level of community organization and engagement with MPA management.
The Basic Steps for Evaluating Management Effectiveness
The basic steps below help identify how to evaluate MPA management success. The table illustrates the steps with examples for each of the three indicator types.
- Clearly identify desired conservation outcome(s) and related management objective(s) for the MPA.
- Identify and develop indicators (social, biophysical, and governance) for evaluating MPA management effectiveness to determine if the management actions have achieved their objective.
- Design and implement a monitoring program aimed at measuring change in indicators as a result of the management action. This requires monitoring replicate sites both inside and outside the MPA, both prior to and after the management action.
- Analyze the data collected during monitoring efforts, and develop a communication plan to share the information to the appropriate audiences.
- Disseminate results and share with stakeholders. Based on feedback, modify management strategies and monitoring efforts accordingly.
| Sample Indicators | |||
| Steps | Biophysical | Socioeconomic | Governance |
| Step 1: Identify conservation outcomes and related management objectives | To protect and maintain the biodiversity of the area |
To protect sustainable livelihoods |
To ensure the MPA is managed |
| Step 2: Identify and develop indicators | Focal species abundance Composition and structure of the community |
Local values and beliefs about marine resources Material style of life, household income distribution by source Level of understanding of human impacts on resources |
Existence of decision-making and management body and management plan Availability of MPA administrative resources Degree of interaction between managers and stakeholders Clearly defined enforcement procedures |
| Step 3: Monitor management actions | Reef Check methodology for evaluating focal species abundance Benthic coral reef survey for composition and structure of community |
Survey questionnaire applied through one-on-one interviews with heads of households (both in communities within an MPA area and outside). |
Analysis of official enforcement reports and semi-structured interviews with enforcement agencies and officials |
| Step 4: Analyze data and develop communication plan | Summarize individual reports for the survey activities |
Summarize individual reports for the survey activities |
Summarize individual reports for the survey activities |
| Step 5: Disseminate results and share with stakeholders | Presentations and public meetings to share reports |
Presentations and public meetings to share reports. Work with management agencies and stakeholders to develop appropriate management strategies. |
Host workshops and small meetings with management practitioners to share reports, and develop strategies. |
Detailed examples of these Five Steps are also included in Monitoring Effectiveness, Monitoring Protocols, and Adaptive Management.
Resources
The Protected Areas Management Effectiveness Information Module