|
This section is intended to help coral reef MPA planners
and managers select resilient coral communities for protection
and determine protected area zones and boundaries.
Many MPAs are designed using a site conservation
planning approach that leads through problem identification
to threat abatement. Specific, often obvious, impacts on
the conservation targets are identified. Then, management
actions are designed to resolve these at the MPA site.
For example, coral breakage might be the consequence
of anchors (the cause) associated with the tourism industry
(the source).
The remedial management measures might call for placement
of moorings, reef closures to facilitate recovery, and
a range of regulations and awareness materials to support
these actions.
Site conservation planning is well designed for
localized threat abatement and may even help to anticipate
some potential stresses linked to distant sources; for example,
sedimentation from a proposed development may be linked to deforestation
in a watershed.
However, site conservation planning by definition
is linked to a specific site. There are targets at the site,
stresses at the site, sources linked to those stresses at
the site, and management strategies for their control or
abatement.
Global, largely unmanageable stresses do not fit
easily into this approach and are better addressed through
strategies for mitigation.
In the face of global change, conservation action should
maintain primary emphasis on threat abatement. But MPA practitioners
should also add a new dimension: management to enhance resilience
in the face of emerging threats. Mass bleaching is one such
danger to coral reefs worldwide that demands immediate action.
| SOURCES |
|
Salm and West 2003,
West and Salm 2003
|
 |